1. explain.film
  2. Sample films
  3. Is Vaping Safer Than Smoking?

Is Vaping Safer Than Smoking?

Data-journalism dark explainer · 55 seconds · English

A 55-second data-journalism explainer: vaping is safer than smoking but not safe. It sets a 2026 Australian review on cancer risk beside the Cochrane review of 80 quitting trials.

The brief
“Is vaping safer than smoking? (2026 answer)”
Style
Data-journalism dark
Length and frame
55 seconds · 16:9
Made for
Lessons and courses

How it was made.

The whole brief was the question, worded the way people search for it. The director picked the style itself. It chose a dark data-journalism look and put both 2026 reviews on one harm scale, so they stop seeming to disagree.

Every claim is kept as strong as its source: “likely to cause”, “about four more in every hundred”. It is a general explanation, not medical advice. It cost about $5 of model spend to make.

Every film on explain.film is made the same way: one sentence in, a storyboard you approve, then the director paints, voices, scores and animates it, and a critic model grades the cut before you see it.

Transcript

  1. Is vaping safer than smoking?
  2. Yes.
  3. Is it safe?
  4. No.
  5. Cigarettes burn tobacco: thousands of chemicals, dozens known to cause cancer.
  6. A vape only heats liquid: far fewer toxins, but not zero.
  7. In June, an Australian review concluded vapes are likely to cause lung and mouth cancer, though how likely is unknown: cancer takes decades to show.
  8. But Cochrane, pooling eighty trials, found vapes beat patches and gum for quitting: about four more in every hundred.
  9. So if a smoker switches completely, vaping is the less harmful choice.
  10. For non-smokers, it only adds risk.
  11. Doing both keeps the dangers of both.
  12. Safer is not safe.

More films made with explain.film.

All films

Got a topic of your own?

One sentence is enough. Approve the storyboard and get a narrated, animated film like this one in about 15 minutes.

Make a film like this